首页> 外文OA文献 >The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial
【2h】

The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial

机译:SANAD研究丙戊酸,拉莫三嗪或托吡酯对全身性和无法分类的癫痫的有效性:一项无盲的随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Valproate is widely accepted as a drug of fi rst choice for patients with generalised onset seizures, and its broad spectrum of effi cacy means it is recommended for patients with seizures that are diffi cult to classify. Lamotrigine and topiramate are also thought to possess broad spectrum activity. The SANAD study aimed to compare the longer-term eff ects of these drugs in patients with generalised onset seizures or seizures that are diffi cult to classify. Methods SANAD was an unblinded randomised controlled trial in hospital-based outpatient clinics in the UK. Arm B of the study recruited 716 patients for whom valproate was considered to be standard treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate between Jan 12, 1999, and Aug 31, 2004, and follow-up data were obtained up to Jan 13, 2006. Primary outcomes were time to treatment failure, and time to 1-year remission, and analysis was by both intention to treat and per protocol. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN38354748. Findings For time to treatment failure, valproate was signifi cantly better than topiramate (hazard ratio 1·57 [95% CI 1·19–2·08]), but there was no signifi cant diff erence between valproate and lamotrigine (1·25 [0·94–1·68]). For patients with an idiopathic generalised epilepsy, valproate was signifi cantly better than both lamotrigine (1·55 [1·07–2·24] and topiramate (1·89 [1·32–2·70]). For time to 12-month remission valproate was signifi cantly better than lamotrigine overall (0·76 [0·62–0·94]), and for the subgroup with an idiopathic generalised epilepsy 0·68 (0·53–0·89). But there was no signifi cant diff erence between valproate and topiramate in either the analysis overall or for the subgroup with an idiopathic generalised epilepsy. Interpretation Valproate is better tolerated than topiramate and more effi cacious than lamotrigine, and should remain the drug of fi rst choice for many patients with generalised and unclassifi ed epilepsies. However, because of known potential adverse eff ects of valproate during pregnancy, the benefi ts for seizure control in women of childbearing years should be considered.
机译:背景丙戊酸被广泛接受为广泛发作性癫痫患者的首选药物,其广泛的疗效意味着推荐用于难以分类的癫痫患者。拉莫三嗪和托吡酯也被认为具有广谱活性。 SANAD研究旨在比较这些药物对广泛发作的癫痫发作或难以分类的癫痫患者的长期疗效。方法SANAD是英国一家医院门诊诊所的非盲随机对照试验。该研究的B组招募了716名丙戊酸盐被视为标准治疗的患者。在1999年1月12日至2004年8月31日期间,将患者随机分配为丙戊酸盐,拉莫三嗪或托吡酯,并获得直至2006年1月13日的随访数据。主要结局是治疗失败的时间和达到1的时间。缓解,并根据治疗意图和方案进行分析。该研究已注册为国际标准随机对照试验,编号为ISRCTN38354748。发现对于治疗失败的时间,丙戊酸盐明显优于托吡酯(危险比1·57 [95%CI 1·19-2·08]),但丙戊酸盐与拉莫三嗪之间无显着差异(1·25 [0·94–1·68])。对于特发性全身性癫痫患者,丙戊酸明显优于拉莫三嗪(1·55 [1·07–2·24]和托吡酯(1·89 [1·32–2·70]),持续时间为12丙戊酸月缓解率总体上显着优于拉莫三嗪(0·76 [0·62-0·94]),特发性全身性癫痫亚组为0·68(0·53-0·89)。在整体分析或特发性全身性癫痫亚组中,丙戊酸和托吡酯之间无显着差异解释丙戊酸比托吡酯耐受性更好,比拉莫三嗪更有效,并且应该是许多人首选的药物患有癫痫的患者,但是由于已知丙戊酸盐在怀孕期间可能产生的不利影响,应考虑控制育龄妇女的癫痫发作。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号